In courts all over the country, lawyers are battling it out over money, property, and personal differences daily. This is civil law. It contrasts with criminal law, in which an individual spends time in jail. However, the fact that nobody is going to jail does not imply that civil cases are small. In some cases, one civil lawsuit may alter the regulations for the entire population.
These are historic cases that demonstrate the law is not an old book. It is an organism that may be manipulated, modified, and enhanced by courageous individuals and intelligent lawyers.
1. The Snail, The Bottle, and The Duty to Care: Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932)
Suppose that you are sitting in a cafe with a friend and drinking. Your friend takes you a bottle of ginger beer. You drink a little, and when the rest is poured away, you have a ghastly surprise: you find a dead, rotting snail falling out of the dark bottle.
This was the case of May Donoghue in Scotland in 1928. She got ill and sued the manufacturer, David Stevenson.
The problem? The manufacturer did not have any contract with her. Her friend bought the drink. With the old laws, the manufacturer was merely liable to the individual who purchased the item. This implied that May Donoghue had no avenue of seeking justice.
The Lawyer Who Never Quit: Walter Leechman
The solicitor of May Donoghue, Walter Leechman, had already lost other similar cases. The majority of lawyers would have ceased. But Leechman saw an opportunity to establish a new rule that would save all the consumers.
He brought the case to the highest court, then the House of Lords. One of the judges, Lord Atkin, wrote an iconic opinion there and established the Neighbor Principle.
The question posed by Lord Atkin was, Who is my neighbor in law? He responded that your neighbor is any person who is so directly and closely influenced by your action that you ought to consider them when you do something. This basic concept implied that a manufacturer had a duty of care not only to the shop that purchased the item, but also to the ultimate individual who consumed it. That meant May Donoghue.
The Impact: This is where the modern-day negligence law of many countries takes its root. When you have ever won a suit because of an injury caused by an ineffective product, or by a careless motorist, you can attribute the result to Mrs. Donoghue and the persistence of her attorney, Mr. Leechman. It established that a company should be cautious to safeguard people who will consume their products.
2. Breaking Down Legal Segregation: Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
This case is probably the most renowned civil rights case in the history of America. It confronted the concept of separate/but equal schools being legal. The main idea was that racial segregation in the public schools was highly unfair and contradicted the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
Although this case involved constitutional law, it began as a huge civil action contesting against unjust government practice.
The Architect of Equality: Thurgood Marshall
The legal team that dealt with Brown v. Board was under the chair of Thurgood Marshall, who was at the time the chief counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. Marshall was not only a great lawyer. He was a strategic master. He took years to accumulate those minor cases to demonstrate that the doctrine of separate but equal, which had been enacted decades prior in Plessy v. Ferguson, always failed. The separate schools were never equal.
Marshall and his team demonstrated to the Supreme Court that segregation harmed the self-worth and the learning capabilities of Black children. Their argument was not based only on legal rules but on social science and history.
The Outcome: The court decided that it was unconstitutional to segregate people in schools sponsored by the state. This was not a decision that opened school doors. It provided the legal assistance necessary to dismantle segregation in every sphere of American life. Marshall won this case and became the first African American Supreme Court Justice. The example of his work reveals that civil law can be the most effective weapon of social transformation.
3. The Modern Fight for Health and Accountability: Robert Bilott and DuPont
A landmark case is not always concerning an individual; sometimes it is safeguarding a community of people against a giant company. It is in this regard that the story of Robert Bilott fits.
Bilott was a corporate defense counsel who typically defended chemical firms. In 1998, however, a farmer by the name Wilbur Tennant of West Virginia requested his assistance. Tennant lost his cattle that were dying of the mysterious disease.
The investigation by Bilatt led to a chemical known as PFOA or C8, which DuPont used in the production of Teflon. He found out that DuPont had long known that this chemical was poisonous and was contaminating the drinking water of the town, which had more than 70,000 people.
The Relentless Advocate: Robert Bilott
Bilatt has spent more than 20 years pursuing a fight against one of the largest chemical companies in the world that she had been defending. To demonstrate what DuPont knew and when, he needed to sift through thousands of internal company documents. It was a complicated case of science, public health, and corporate deceit.
He initially pursued a class action lawsuit on behalf of all the people in the region who were consuming the contaminated water. He later won a huge settlement of more than 671 million to more than 3,500 individuals who contracted diseases such as kidney cancer and testicular cancer related to the PFOA.
The Value: The case of Bilatt against DuPont is a classic example of a current-day civil tort. It developed a social consciousness about forever chemicals (PFAS), altered environmental laws, and demonstrated that one lawyer can make corporate giants change their behavior of polluting the planet and endangering the health of people. It demonstrates that civil justice tends to be the final defense against corporate power.
4. Defining Love and Liberty: Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
Controversial cases in civil law frequently correspond to the question of what it takes to be a person before the law- particularly, the right to dignity and equality. This case, by a modern Supreme Court, resolved the issue as to whether the Fourteenth Amendment obligates states to admit and legalize same-sex marriage.
The plaintiff, who was the lead, was Jim Obergefell, who sued on the basis that the state of Ohio failed to record him as the surviving spouse in the death certificate of his husband, John Arthur, whom they had legally married in Maryland. This was a very personal statement of the importance of legal attention during the most difficult times of existence.
The Champions of Equality: Mary Bonauto and Team
Several brilliant lawyers, such as Mary Bonauto, headed the legal battle of the plaintiffs. The case was argued before the Supreme Court by Bonauto, who had been advocating marriage equality in the state courts. Her arguments revolved around the fundamental right to a marriage with your beloved person and the concept that same sex couples being denied the right to marry is a contravention of the equal protection provided by the Constitution. same-sex couples violate the equal protection guaranteed by the Constitution.
The Historic Ruling: The Supreme Court voted 5-4 in support of Obergefell. According to the majority opinion of Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Constitution guaranteed liberty to everyone and that liberty encompassed the right to marry, which is fundamental. This decision instantly legalized same-sex marriage throughout the United States, transforming the legal and social fabric of the country overnight.
This case demonstrates that civil litigation is not all about money; it is about dignity. It is concerning the right to live your life, marry, have a family, be buried beside your partner, without the government dictating to you no, because of who you are.
Final Thoughts from the Attorney
I have always been motivated to study these cases, though being in the presence of the civil justice system has provided me with a stronger admiration for these attorneys.
Being a paralegal, I was taught to cope with the enormous amounts of details that must be retained to maintain a major case on track. Now, as a lawyer, I understand that the real work does not lie in finding the law but in narrating to the client the story, simply and directly, as Walter Leechman did with the snail in the bottle.
These instances are a sobering lesson. The civil law is where individuals struggle to have the right to be shielded against defective goods, corporate lust, as well as government regulations that are just plain unjust. You must remember those stories in case you have to deal with some injustice. They demonstrate how anyone can make history when they have persevered and have good legal reasoning.
You can also read more of my detailed legal blogs on my Medium profile if you’re interested in exploring further.
